Abstract:
Abstract:
The Constitution is an important body that regulates the framework for a country's
management and brings stability and guidance to its systems of government and law.
Amending the Constitution is a critical step in maintaining the legislative structure current
and versatile to dynamic changes. Regardless of its importance, the method of amending
the Constitution has far too frequently sought to fully represent citizens' needs and desires.
The purpose of this study is to elucidate on this defeat to provide a greater comprehension
of the amendment process in two countries: Bangladesh and the United States. The writers of the Constitution anticipated an adaptable memorandum and understood the necessity of being able to amend it to maintain the structure up to date. Regrettably, in practice, amendments to the constitution have often prioritized those in power rather than
representing citizens' viewpoints. This study will look at the amendment process in
Bangladesh and the United States, including the legal and political frameworks that govern
it, the roles of crucial players and institutions, and the outcomes of prior amendments. The
study will employ a comparative analysis approach to display any distinctions and
similarities in the two countries' amendment processes. The subsequent research questions will be answered in this study: What is the method of constitutional amendment in Bangladesh and the United States? Are there any similarities and differences in the
amendment process between the two countries? How have previous amendments
influenced each country's constitutional framework? The process of amending the
Constitution is complicated and complex, impacted by the country's political, social, and
cultural context. The amendment procedures in both Bangladesh and the United States will be thoroughly examined in order to provide a thorough understanding of the processes in both countries. The role of key actors and institutions, such as the legislative and executive branches of government, the judiciary, and civil society organizations, will be investigated. The impact of previous amendments on the stability and legitimacy of the constitutional framework will also be assessed.
