Rahman, Alima

dc.contributor.author	Rahman, Alima
dc.date.accessioned	2024-04-01T04:13:10Z
dc.date.available	2024-04-01T04:13:10Z
dc.date.issued	2024-01-01
dc.identifier.uri	http://103.15.140.189/handle/123456789/307
dc.description	Internship Report	en_US
dc.description.abstract	This research paper is written on the topic, “International Humanitarian Law (IHL) and Islamic Law of War: A Critical Study’’. Wars do not occur in an absence of law in the modern era. International Humanitarian Law (IHL) and Islamic Laws of War are two legal frameworks that address the use of force and the conduct of wars. These legal systems derive from elders' teachings, which have been further developed into laws and guidelines to lessen the devastation that might result from armed conflict. Regulating belligerent behavior is the main goal of both systems in order to prevent or at least lessen the suffering of both combatants and non-combatants in the theater of conflict. In order to compare Islamic principles and laws upon the conduct of hostilities with comparable IHL requirements, this study employs a comparative analysis methodology. This study focuses on the areas where Islamic Laws of War and International Humanitarian Law overlap rather than evaluating them against one another. It examines whether both of these legal systems differ significantly in how they uphold the ethics and tenets of combat and offers a means of humanization	en_US
dc.language.iso	en_US	en_US
dc.publisher	Department of Law and Justice(BUBT)	en_US
dc.subject	LAW	en_US
dc.subject	Critical Study	en_US
dc.subject	Islamic Law	en_US
dc.subject	war	en_US
dc.subject	International Humanitarian Law	en_US
dc.title	"International Humanitarian Law (IHL) and Islamic Law of War: A Critical Study"	en_US
dc.type	Technical Report	en_US